To further refine your search, you can use additional qualifiers such as score:>0.5. For example, the search score:>=0.5 created:<1y grammar would return only posts mentioning "grammar" that have a score >= 0.5 and were created less than a year ago.
score:>0.5
score:>=0.5 created:<1y grammar
Further help with searching is available in the help center.
Quick hints: tag:tagname, user:xxx, "exact phrase", post_type:xxx, created:<N{d,w,mo,y}, score:>=0.5
tag:tagname
user:xxx
"exact phrase"
post_type:xxx
created:<N{d,w,mo,y}
score:>=0.5
Although @tty's answer is technically correct, it represents a peak TPS due to fluctuations in the block rate, which doesn't represent Kaspa's throughput over time. I think a more interesting metri...
posted 3mo ago by someone235
No monetary incentive but security as an incentive by keeping the network decentralized.
posted 3mo ago by toeknee
Layer 2's are generally speaking an overloaded term, which could mean different terms to different people. I use the definition I consider the most useful and unambiguous. Layer 2 is an external a...
posted 3d ago by FreshAir28
From the perspective of mining profitability, connecting to public nodes is generally superior to private nodes. This is because public nodes offer advantages in block propagation efficiency, orpha...
posted 3mo ago by tty · edited 3mo ago by tty
Key Context on Kaspa's TPSAchieved Peaks (Mainnet Records):September 14, 2025: 3,585 TPS September 17, 2025: 3,210 TPS September 18, 2025: 3,585 TPS (surpassing Solana's prior record of 2,909 TPS...
posted 3mo ago by tty
What is the max tps achievable by Kaspa as it is today?
2 answers · posted 3mo ago by FreshAir28 · last activity 3mo ago by someone235
There is a WiP Yellowpaper here: https://github.com/kaspanet/research/tree/main/vProgs vProgs stand for verifiable programs, i.e. programs whose execution commands (transactions) are sequenced on...
posted 3mo ago by FreshAir28 · edited 3mo ago by FreshAir28
There are no incentives to run a public node other than altruism.
KIP-17 allows scripts to constrain how the owner spends. Can it also allow scripts to define conditions under which a third party can spend without the owner's signature? For example: 'Address X ...
1 answer · posted 24d ago by Eg4n92 · last activity 24d ago by someone235
How many Transactions per Block? What is the theoretical maximum? What is the general average?
1 answer · posted 3mo ago by RayS · last activity 3mo ago by someone235
No, in Kaspa each blue block receives a reward. The main reason is that rewarding only chain blocks (VSPC blocks) creates incentives for selfish mining. But there are other (milder) advantages to ...
posted 3mo ago by someone235 · edited 3mo ago by someone235
If the partition lasts less than a finality period (12 hours currently IIRC) then when remerged, then the effect is simply that one branch will become mostly red. Since red block's transactions are...
posted 3mo ago by FreshAir28
Can only the miners who generated the blocks included in VSPC receive the fees?
2 answers · posted 3mo ago by Mai · last activity 2mo ago by someone235
As the subject "vprogs" is here and there within the developer talks and chats, I'd like to know what it is in general. So is there some kind of introduction or whitepaper around? What is "vprogs",...
1 answer · posted 3mo ago by Helix · last activity 3mo ago by FreshAir28
What are the incentives to run a public node (vs. Private)?
3 answers · posted 3mo ago by Kas22 · last activity 3mo ago by toeknee
Yes. Your specific use case can already be implemented via KIP 10, that enables some covenants functionality. Assuming Alice wants to grant Bob the permission to charge her with 10 KAS/month, she ...
posted 24d ago by someone235
In the context of vProgs, what is the definition of L2 for a person that has no prior knowledge on technicalities?
1 answer · posted 15d ago by IzioDev · last activity 3d ago by FreshAir28
Yes — red blocks themselves don’t receive rewards, but there’s an important subtlety. If rewards were simply destroyed whenever a red block appeared, the issuance rate of new KAS would fall behind...
GHOSTDAG partitions the blockDAG into blue blocks and red blocks. In the final ordering, blue blocks take precedence, while red blocks are placed after them (unless the DAG’s topology forces otherw...
1 answer · posted 3mo ago by someone235 · last activity 3mo ago by someone235
Could Kaspa in full throughput run on Tor? Is running on Tor something we consider desirable?
0 answers · posted 2mo ago by FreshAir28
If a transaction is included in two parallel blocks, then it will be accepted in one block and "rejected" in the other. Since rejected transactions do not consume their utxo, and let alone do not p...
posted 26d ago by FreshAir28 · edited 26d ago by FreshAir28
In many rollups mechanisms there's a need to save the pre-image of the most recent state commitment in order to continue operating. This means that once the rollup validators lose the state the rol...
1 answer · posted 2mo ago by someone235 · last activity 2mo ago by FreshAir28
For simplicity of description I assume below any interaction is a write interaction on all associated accounts. First it is important to emphasize the following - while A,B are each sovereign logi...
posted 2mo ago by FreshAir28 · edited 2mo ago by FreshAir28
If a transaction (with a fee of 2 KAS) is included in two parallel (non-parent-child) blocks, A and B, can the fee be used as a UTXO in both A and B? Or only in one of them? If only in one, can the...
1 answer · posted 1mo ago by Mai · last activity 26d ago by FreshAir28
It can be anyone. It is an entity that creates zk proofs for the execution of that vProg according to its committed source code, and the de facto transactions addressed to it as sequenced by L1. ...
This community is part of a network of communities — take a look!
Want to advertise this community? Use our templates!
